Read Time: 1 min 50 secs
Hey — Ryan To here.
In today's edition:
Why founder-led content is a trap (not how you think)
How algorithms transformed consumer growth
Ridge Wallet's playbook for never depending on one channel
Everyone's telling you to get on camera.
"Be the face of your brand." "Founder-led content is the future."
"Just start posting."
And they're not wrong, but they're not telling you the full picture.
After advising brands like SuperBonsai, Auri Nutrition, and Immi Ramen on their content strategy, here's what I've seen actually play out…
Founder-led content playbook
Let me be clear…there are real reasons to do it:
Investors and fundraising. VCs watch your content. A strong founder presence builds credibility before you ever get in the room.
Network and luck. The right post gets seen by the right person. Doors open that cold emails can't.
Brand trust. Putting a face to the company name builds loyalty that a logo page never will.
If your customer is other founders. Founder-led content attracts founders. If that's your buyer, go all in.
But here's what nobody talks about:
→ Hundreds of hours spent making content, not building the business
→ No guarantee those views actually convert
→ You becoming the growth bottleneck to scaling your brand
Founder-led content is a high-effort bet.
And if your customer isn't other founders. If you're selling supplements or skincare or cookware to everyday consumers, it's rarely the thing that scales your revenue.
Relying on one channel to drive all the growth of your consumer brand is a risky bet.
Here's why.
The Consumer Algorithm
Every post enters a small "test pool" of users the algorithm thinks will care
Based on their interests, not who they follow.
If that test pool engages (especially shares), it pushes wider.
If not, the post dies.
This means:
→ A 100-follower account has the same viral potential as a 1M-follower account
→ Follower count is a vanity metric. Reach is now decided per post, not per account
→ If your content mixes topics (fitness Monday, finance Tuesday, comedy Wednesday), the algorithm doesn't know who to serve it to and penalizes your reach
Diversification
Sean Frank, CEO of Ridge Wallet, Paranoia Allocation framework is the clearest I've seen.
His core belief: building your revenue on one or two channels is not a marketing strategy.
It's an existential threat.
The "Paranoia" Allocation Model:
60-70% of budget goes to proven core channels
The rest gets aggressively deployed to test unproven platforms
You don't wait until your main channel taps out to start looking for a lifeboat. You build the lifeboat while the ship is still floating.
The "Early Adopter" Arbitrage:
Ridge was one of the first advertisers on Snapchat captured massive returns before the big brands drove up prices
They moved into TV spending before iOS 14 crippled their competitors
Now they're testing ChatGPT ads and AI-driven e-commerce traffic
The principle: you use profits from your winning channels to subsidize discovery of new ones. Constantly.
Frank's line that stuck with me: you don't optimize one channel to death. You expand to survive.
Have a great day ❤️
|
Ryan To
Creator (120K+)
@itsryanto
|
|